A friend pointed out this article “After feminism: what are girls supposed to do?” and asked me what I thought about it. So here goes.
Jezebel posted about this article over the weekend:
Hill's piece, titled "After Feminism: What Are Girls Supposed To Do?" focuses on the increasingly difficult lives of teenage girls, and how hard it's become to navigate those tricky years thanks to societal pressures regarding success, sexuality, and intelligence. The consistently mixed messages being sent to young girls, Hill notes, have lead to an increase in eating disorders, behavioral problems, and "risky behaviors" amongst the already vulnerable population: "Who, after all, wouldn't feel confused and unhappy being raised in this brave new world that demands super-skinny, super-sexy and super-brainy all at the same time?"
As Jezebel notes, every generation gets their own “isn’t anyone thinking about the children?!” stories, and there is always something new to panic about. I like to give teenage girls the benefit of the doubt when it comes to navigating the difficult terrain of growing up, since myself, my sisters, and all of my friends seemed to turn out just fine. But girls today are definitely facing a different world than I did when I was younger.
However, there are a few things that bother me about this article. First is the title. It insinuates that feminism is somehow to blame for teenage girls getting into trouble with police and flunking out of school because they have “too many choices.” Please. This is not why they are doing these things, and I’m so tired of hearing the argument that too many choices are the root of women’s problems. Choice is a good thing.
Another issue I have is with the murky statistics, for example this:
A number of other studies, both in the UK and elsewhere, have indeed come to similar conclusions. Last week government research into 42,073 children between the ages of 10 and 15 concluded that teenage girls were a vulnerable demographic, urgently in need of help.
This sounds quite alarmist, but what exactly does “vulnerable” mean, and what kind of help do they need? How urgent is this need for help? And what kind of help are we talking about here?
I will agree with a few points here. First of all, if girls are indeed facing more instances of depression, eating disorders, and other illnesses, they should be treated appropriately. This shouldn't be taken lightly.
Next, girls are definitely facing more pressure to fit in in a highly sexualized culture, where sexuality, rather than intelligence and competence, is seen as a source of empowerment:
The sex industry has moved from the margin to the mainstream. Girls are besieged by images that glorify a pornographic view of women. There is a lap-dancing club in every town centre, six-year-old girls are bought fashion accessories adorned with the Playboy logo, Shakira writhes on all fours in a cage on MTV.
Ariel Levy chronicled this phenomenon in her book Female Chauvinist Pigs, which explored how women use their sexuality as power, a trend she traces back to conflicts between the women's movement and the sexual revolution long left unresolved. You see examples of this with women lifting their shirts for Girls Gone Wild, stripping being considered empowering, and the fact that a woman runs Playboy. Now these ideologies are being placed on younger and younger women. Feminists today are working to make girls see that their self worth does not reside in their sexuality, and Jessica Valenti makes this point with her book The Purity Myth, which is about the abstinence movement and the “cult” of virginity. Girls being encouraged to hold on to their virginity to be “pure” and girls who are told to give it up to “popular” are facing the exact same message: your self worth is dependent on your sexuality.
This needs to change, but I’m not sure what the answers are to solve this problem. Hill doesn’t provide any answers either (another problem I had with this piece). We can’t stop advertising companies from sexualizing women or women like Paris Hilton from becoming a celebrity because of a sex tape, so maybe the answer lies with reaching the girls first- before the media gets to them.
Getting girls into programs, sports, and other activities that bring out and celebrate their talents, and encouraging them to work hard at what they are good at, and find power through those attributes rather than their looks can help. This is a daunting task, as the amount of influence the media has on them is great. But media literacy should be a part of everyone’s education- boys and girls- from a young age.
I also think that there should be initiatives to support both sexes as they grow up. Teaching girls that their self worth doesn't reside with their sexuality will be much more effective if boys are taught that, too. Boys are also facing similar pressures as these girls that are different than the pressure their fathers faced, and even if they aren't "suffering" in the way girls are, the issue should be addressed as well.
For more thoughts, check out the comments on this post.
3 comments:
Meh. First of all, the article sucks. (I've begun to not trust a lot of the British press, especially when it comes to article of this type. They're always terrible.)Two, a lot of it is shady (as you noted), and British-centric, which I feel does not accurately pertain to America.
My biggest thing, though, is that I do not think this is any really different than it has been. Sure, our culture has gotten more sexualized, with the sex tapes, the Paris Hilton, ChatRoulette, sexting, etc, but despite that, these pressures have existed for some time. I was watching a television show I loved in high school over the weekend, and several times characters (including teenage girls) have remarked upon the "pressures" that this demographic faces. Their complaints were the same (minus the ones connected to new technology--these episodes were from 2001/2002.)
I have no desire to go back in time, to be that age and deal with all the stuff now. But this article doesn't make a convincing case that things are so much worse than they have been, that the challenges are unique.
I do recommend reading Twenge, though. She offers real insight and analysis on our generation, not just teenagers.
My favorite element was the idea that having choices is not "to blame" for the situation. As someone who is employed by a girl serving organization but not yet a mother, I read many articles like yours for work and am increasingly scared to death to have my own daughters. However, every generation has its challenges and these are just the current ones. Like you, your sisters and friends, I'm sure most girls will turn out just fine. (Now if only we can keep the Playboy logo away from grade school girls.) For more blogging on girls check out http://gsctx.blogspot.com
MediaMaven- I agree with not trusting the British press. Usually when I read British articles I have some type of "WTF?" look on my face. The title of this really irks me the most, though. I'm so sick of people blaming feminism every time a woman gets depressed or does something "surprising." It's such crap.
Cheryl- I completely understand what you mean by being afraid to have daughters, but please try not to be! I think role models can make a world of a difference, so have kids and raise them to be strong, independent, intelligent and release them out into the world. We could always use more people like that!
Post a Comment